Friday, May 2, 2008

Patents and the Poor

Joseph Stiglitz wrote on Intellectual Property rights and the poor, opposing strict patent rights that benefit drug companies. For another perspective, I'm linking to an article by the director of a free-trade think-tank in Ghana who opposes patent-breaking on the grounds that it hurts the poor.
If countries start breaking patents, though, firms lose out on sales. And they’re less able to finance the development of new cures. That’s a blow to the public health efforts of all countries, rich and poor. Ghana’s health Minister told me that he fails to see how people could hold antagonistic positions against pharmaceutical companies, because in his own words "if drugs are being made, then people must be sick somewhere-it is not for charity".

Poor patent enforcement also gives rise to potentially harmful copycats. The generic pharmaceuticals manufactured in the developing world often don’t comply with international safety regulations. Low-quality and counterfeit drugs are common. The WHO estimates that 10 percent of the world’s drugs are counterfeit. Patent-theft is making the problem worse.

I feel as though Stiglitz could successful refute this account on the grounds that Africa makes a small portion of the pharmaceutical industry sales and that the small loss of profits is tiny compared to the benefit of making life-saving drugs available.

"The Poor Stand to Lose from Anti-Patent Crusades"